Yeah, good point...except for the fact that it's fair to say a lot more lives were lost by by the knee jerk reaction to go to war, then will be lost by short on intelligence socio-economic actions taken by Obama and Co.....Nonetheless, it's either bail everyone out and build up social programs and take money and incentive from those of us who are capitalists, or focus on free market and let the rich get richer and the poor get poorer...It seems with either situation, our leaders are looking for an answer that will give them the most popularity among us commonersActually you would do well to learn some of the lessons of the Iraq fiasco. After 911, there was tremendous pressure to just do something highly reactive even if there was not a lot of intelligence to go with it. Similarly, we woke up one day last september or so and all the experts had concluded that the sky was falling and even today Obama just rattles on endlessly about about "all the experts" agree that we need to do this. And it needs to be big, and it needs to be right now, and we dont have a lot of time for reflection. Nevermind that that is not true and there is no history of curing the problems of overspending by overspending on an even larger scale. As with Bush after 911, it is quite possible to dig yourself in deeper with a half-baked response. Obama is well on his way.
Nevertheless, the President wants to do something big and splashy based on very little intelligence. This is going to be Obama's Iraq. He wants to carpet bomb the country with giveaway dollars. Libs are defending him by pointing out ad nauseam that he is not George Bush. That isnt going to work much longer. He is into something now that he is actually responsible for. Sure, he inherited this or that. Poor baby, there isnt a single president whose presidency was not defined on how they dealt with issues that had absolutely nothing to do with what they campaigned on. Not one.
It is also worth noting that we are having a worldwide recession/depression so George Bush and the Iraq war are not necessarily responsible for everyone else's economy. Probably there are other factors at play. Although I know in lib economics no sparrow falls that America is not responsible for.