- 990
Al3 is conflicted.
That's about as "nice" as I can put it.
Perhaps some latent flambe tendencies are surfacing ... who knows?
That's about as "nice" as I can put it.
Perhaps some latent flambe tendencies are surfacing ... who knows?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Diamonds and bon-bons, huh?
I am more in to fine wine and a great steak.
You know how unions often have work-rules... there has to be two guys to do the job of one. It used to be called "featherbedding." And I assume you have heard of minimum wage laws?
Conservatives and Libertarians really hate union interference in the workplace. They go postal over such things... where the unions dictate to management how the work should be done. And do they hate minimum wage rules? With a passion.Al
Well, lookie, lookie, lookie. The carriers ("management" in this case) hate it just as much as you conservatives do. They decided that in a world of finite resources that agents (the "union" in this case) did not contribute enough to the enterprise so they decided to pay you what they think your real value is. Al
They obviously didn't see your hundred grand worth the payout... so they cut it. It's what any good conservative businessperson would do and is the kind of policy every good conservative would support.Al
OK, maybe the MLR is interference in the free market, but so are taxes and child-labor laws and similar social legislation. My point is that IF the carriers valued your contribution to their "system" they would have found other ways to cut costs so as to keep your six-figure income intact.Al
They did what is in their best interest... and you are pissed at them for it? Are you going to tell me they could not have found a way to keep within the bounds of the MLR and have continued your comp? Of course they could have. You can blame Obamacare all you want, but at the end of the day your pay was cut by those who pay you (duh!) As I say, it was in their best interest to do that.Al
The public at large will do what they see as being in their best interest... and will support a single-payor, nationalized health system where there are no greedy insurance companies and corresponding agents. Al
We are evolving toward a position that Europe reached years ago... that access to affordable health care is a right for all people, not a privilege of the rich.Al
Fight against it if you wish. Rant and rail against it if you must. But you are on the wrong side of history, just as your grandparents parents were about social security, your parents were about Medicare and civil rights, and how so many of you are about health reform.Al
Most die-hard conservatives don't want a system that works. They want a system that they can get rich from.
They don't care if someone who is rich waits in the ER for 6 hours. They simply don't want someone poor (especially a minority of color) sitting next to them. In a perfect conservative system, no one wins... except the rich who are more than equal.
Conservatives have never wanted the rich to be richer, just for the poor to be poorer.
Al
NFIB is mostly small business, self employed, fewer than 5 employees.
This will impact rates for those businesses as well IF they provide group insurance. As it now stands, groups under 50 are not required to pay or play but if they do play it will be costly.
Quoted a 2 life group this AM and rates for a $5,000 deductible copay plan started at $1700/mo standard rates and went all the way up to $2900.
This husband and wife group has several health issues and will be hit with the max rate up of 70%.
I have been seeing stuff like this since last summer, shortly after Obamacrap was passed.
Probably just a coincidence . . .