- Thread starter
- #21
- 901
What this article misses is that there WAS a severability clause in the original House version.
This gives ammo to good lawyers who can argue that Congress intentionally omitted it from the final legislation, meaning that Congress intended for the entire legislation to fall if the mandate (or any other provision) were deemed unconstitutional.
This author has no special insight into how the Court will actually handle the issue. And it is worth noting that the Florida AG has specifically argued (to the Fed FL Dist Ct) that the entire law should be invalidated.