- 205
This forum is turning into a doomsday discussion board. I feel like we're one thread away from covering bunker building in our backyards.
If you're concerned with change in the industry, hedge your bet a bit. Have other investments, work with carriers who align themselves with the independent agent model (The Hartford is a company who clearly doesn't), and lastly keep writing as much good clean business as possible. We'll be fine...
It's been a doomsday discussion since the 2000's. Every week there is an article in a P&C mag or on an online blog about how us indies and captive agents are going to be pushed out.
I think your point with working with carriers like Hartford has a lot of truth. There are about 40,000 independent agencies with 380,000 agents and God knows how many agents. I think the IIABA and any other indy agency organization really needs to start pushing back at these carriers that want to cut us out by cutting them out. Especially with a carrier like the Hartford who can easily compete with any other carrier. Let's just en masse place them with someone else who is competitive and not trying to cut us out.
People DO get freaked out about stuff like this. I agree It shouldn't worry most of us. I don't agree we should treat it as business as usual, the way it's been done the past 30 years. Keep what works, change what no longer does. Meanwhile, keep a finger on the pulse. Be ready for change.
Not only is the industry changing technologically(?) or its methodology but I think it's important to note just how much the pie in P&C has grown in the last 30 years. I don't have the numbers to back it up, but I'd bet P&C revenue or any insurance revenue has exploded way above and beyond the rate of inflation. I'm not saying the pie isn't going to get bigger, but I don't think it's going to get bigger as fast, which actually might not be a bad thing considering there are more agents leaving then coming into the industry.
As the law stands insurance is required to be sold through licensed "agents". Would an automated, multiple carrier, online model qualify as an "agent" to quote and issue? Or would it only be allowed to generate quotes then pass it to a human "agent" to issue?
I'm not the one to fight progress but the problem with having an online portal for instant quotes/issue is that consumers have no idea what they are buying. Sure, they can be directed to a state licensed CSR probably multiple states away, but there job is going to be to get you on a call and get you out, much like customer service for any of the big corporations. That's why independent agencies work.
You know, it's only going to take a little time for people to know someone who bought state minimums because it was the cheapest, only to get into an at-fault only to get sued and lose their home, savings and any other big asset. Then consumers are going to ask if they want to be that guy that loses everything simply because they wanted to save a few bucks. Just my opinion.
Didn't google already try this an fail? Progressive has this too and I get calls all the time from people saying Progressive said you're more competitive can we go through a quote?
I have people all the time that say they wish they would have switched to an indy agent earlier. If you target the right markets (standard and non-preferred) that $100 to them isn't that big of a difference to go direct. While also embracing non-standard as, in my opinion, the future of the US looks to have some problems in the economy going forward.