United Life

[Rirwin]

They settled. Would you settle if you weren't guilty? I wouldn't.

If you wouldn't, it's because you don't have money or much to lose.

Settling is a cheaper option for most companies.

If someone was really guilty, why would another party allow them to settle without admission to guilt? Your argument goes both ways.

 

[ExProgrammer]

Hello, I am brand new here and wanted to say hi to everybody. I tried to do it in a new tread, but must be doing something wrong. Plus I am
not a computer whiz at all. lol

Hi Bill,

Welcome to the forum. You should see a "Post New Thread" button at the top of the page when you first come into a forum (e.g. the Final Expense Forum). But you won't see it once you open a thread in the forum.

I'm an ExProgrammer, but I've never whizzed on a computer.

Tim

 

[Rirwin]

Are you talking about American Amicable who maybe sorta riped off American military members?

I couldn't watch the video, it was so bad! But I got curious and did some research.

Looks like it wasn't wrong. Doing from American amicable, but wrong doing from agents.

WTOC

The carrier is held liable for the action of their agents. This even applies to compliance concerns. That's why some companies have rules on how you can market customers.

 

[mudhound]

LOL! By the 3rd page this post became something else.
It went from United Life to ????????

 

[Rirwin]

LOL! By the 3rd page this post became something else.
It went from United Life to ????????

You can't be on this forum without having ADD, you'd get lost!

 

[goillini52]

If you wouldn't, it's because you don't have money or much to lose.

Settling is a cheaper option for most companies.

If someone was really guilty, why would another party allow them to settle without admission to guilt? Your argument goes both ways.

If you say so. I think it's because I'm stubborn.

Yes, settling is cheaper, not only in legal fees, but it also gets the bad news out of the headlines so that it'll die down and be forgotten about quicker. You know, "out of sight...out of mind".

Prosecutors make deals all the time. They look at a settlement as a win because they got something for the victim. Also, they're able to handle more cases with the time making deals opens up.

Bob Mueller sure like to make deals.

 

[goillini52]

LOL! By the 3rd page this post became something else.
It went from United Life to ????????

Hahaha, it's not unusual for threads to get off track on the 1st page.

 

[shonceman]

I couldn't watch the video, it was so bad! But I got curious and did some research.

Looks like it wasn't wrong. Doing from American amicable, but wrong doing from agents.

WTOC

The carrier is held liable for the action of their agents. This even applies to compliance concerns. That's why some companies have rules on how you can market customers.

"Senior Noncommissioned Officers appeared to have left Soldiers with the impression that the Soldiers were required to attend "class' or presentations..." So, if the company can be held liable for the actions of their agents, it seems like the Army should also be held liable for the actions of their officers.

 

[goillini52]

"Senior Noncommissioned Officers appeared to have left Soldiers with the impression that the Soldiers were required to attend "class' or presentations..." So, if the company can be held liable for the actions of their agents, it seems like the Army should also be held liable for the actions of their officers.

There's corruption everywhere.

 

[rousemark]

There's corruption everywhere.

Even in the Monkey Kingdom????