What is the catch?

I ran into a policy that the insured has had since 2009, when she was 67 (she is now 76). It is a Principal Universal Life Protector III product which I believe is a GUL. She did not put any money into this policy aside from the premiums she has been paying. She has been paying $88 per month since she got the policy for $50,000 of coverage.I called Principal and verified these details with a customer service rep as well as her supervisor. Both of them also told me that the $88 is guaranteed to provide $50,000 of coverage until she is 121 years old. I asked this several different ways as it didn't add up to me and they assured me that if she pays $88 per month for the rest of her life, she will always have $50,000 of coverage. I can only get a 67 year old about $20,000 of final expense coverage for that premium amount. I understand that GULs don't really build cash value, but it seems very strange to me that the cost of insurance (currently $93) is already above her monthly premium. What am I missing? She has put less than $10,000 into a $50,000 policy and will never have a premium increase despite the COI already being lower than her premium.

I don't know anything about this case but company phone reps will give you verbal guarantees all day long when you call in. You need the in force illustration sent to you.
 
An email from an IMO whose newsletter I receive:

The COVID-19 Pandemic may just be claiming its latest victim, Guaranteed Universal Life.

GULs ever increasing popularity as a cost effective way to build a tailored permanent life life insurance -
especially for Baby Boomer looking for Life/Long Term Care Insurance options
- may soon be relic of the past.

A rash of price changes over the last 6 to 8 months due to 2020 mortality updates and the onslaught of new "lower than low" interest rates (thanks to Covid-19), has seen GUL Pricing increase by 10-40% (depending on age, class and carrier.)

And now the first possible signs of a critically ill patient, one of the largest providers of GUL, announced on Monday July 6th, 2020 that they were pulling their GUL off the market effective 07/13/2020! Click here to read the release from Prudential!

Question is, who will be next?
As always, once a large carrier chooses to lead the way, many others seem to line up and follow suit! Just a matter of time. As of the printing of this piece, and much like Pru has already done, GUL market leaders like Principal, Nationwide, Penn Mutual, Symetra, AIG, and several other carriers have increased their GUL pricing. Will they feel the heat and pull out of the market next? Word on "the street" is the few hold outs like Sagicor, are working on pricing changes that will be released as soon as possible.

CALL TO ACTION!
You must speak to your client and anyone you meet, and let them know that now is the time to take action. There are a few carriers who have done some repricing, and for now, seem to be committed to staying in the GUL business. You must tell them, that the time is now to:
  • Do that term conversion
  • Review and implement that Hybrid Life/LTC protection plan
  • Act on your wealth transfer plans
Prudential


 
I don't know anything about this case but company phone reps will give you verbal guarantees all day long when you call in. You need the in force illustration sent to you.

True, but this is a GUL. Paying a guaranteed set price for a guaranteed face amount is kind of what makes a GUL a GUL....so, if the agent knows for a fact that it is a GUL, then that IS the answer 100% of the time. You wouldn't even need for Customer Service to tell you that.
 
True, but this is a GUL. Paying a guaranteed set price for a guaranteed face amount is kind of what makes a GUL a GUL....so, if the agent knows for a fact that it is a GUL, then that IS the answer 100% of the time. You wouldn't even need for Customer Service to tell you that.
I was going by her statement "...which I believe is a GUL."

Knowing and believing are very different.
 
Back
Top