White House Announces Contraception Compromise

I listened to her recent testimony, it was absurd.

Kinda scary she's getting a law degree from Georgetown so she can go out and make other over dramatized claims and wreak havoc on those of us that live in the real world.

There are some things like illegal immigration, requiring an ID to vote, and this where you just look at the people making the argument for the other side and go W.T.F.?

Its been a couple of days since I heard her, but one of her claims was she had to make the choice between having to choose between not having birth control or going to a lesser school. Huh? I had to go to a 'lesser school' when my brother spent his college money and mine on an Ivy League English degree he's never used. This whole concept of other people having to give me everything I want that so many people in this country have has got to go...She's basically saying "Georgetown's policies made me have to make a choice that I didn't want to make so I'm going to government to make them do what I want". That's not really the issue at hand, but that's the basics of what she's saying in her testimony. AND she'd getting a law degree so she can do this her whole life. Joy.

I mean really, she's bitching that her free ride to a school that's gonna give her a job paying $150k+ first year out isn't buying her a $30 prescription so she can get laid without buying a $1 condom. Its ludicrous. The way she phrased it all was so melodramatic and full of BS it was frustrating to listen to.
 
The Senate has killed an amendment which would have allowed employers to opt-out of the birth control mandate.

Senate rejects Blunt amendment to limit birth-control mandate - The Hill's Floor Action

Compromise? I bet insurance companies are just loving the way they're getting yanked around, literally from month-to-month, by this dictatorship.. er, I mean "Administration". It's amazing that more don't just leave the health business. You can't imagine how heavy the government will be leaning on them if the Supreme Court upholds the ACA.

-AC
 
No point - just thought it was very interesting in that these college girls cite a $3,000 per year expense for birth control pills.

It's not per year, it's over 3 years. I can imagine that birthcontrol would be expensive without ins. coverage.
 
Correct, I listed to her testimony and found no relevance. $1,000 a year and she cited married college girls who couldn't afford birth control.

I'm not sure what in the hell that has to do with carriers. Use a rubber.

Huffpo's headliner today is that poor people are being left behind because they can't afford computers with a sob story article about a women who's computer broke and she can't afford to buy a new one. Where's Susan Powter with "Stop the Insanity."

We have already created an environment of utter dependence on the government. Where does that lead? Dunno - give Greece a call.
 
Last edited:
What? Why? I've never been fond of bith control, but I've lived long enuf to recognize some changes in society.

I've never been fond of over dependence upon tax funded progarms either. But, over the years I've recognized that something caused some change.

Those changes being fewer street urchins running wild.
As well as fewer beggers on the streets.

What might have been the cause of those changes?

Just asking,...what would motivate us to want that back.?

I think that generations behind me have to be able to foresee consequences of political changes/actions, because as taxpayor I'm as angry as the rest. But, reasoning before action taken has to improve.

Another thing I've noticed, the more college educated get control, the more out of control......I do NOT underrstand that either???? "I want my share of Pell grant contributions back. It's not showng a profit that I can see)
 
Back
Top