- Thread starter
- #21
Rob Lion
Guru
- 653
People sure confuse FE commission % with actual whole life commission %.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While selling Whole Life may be more profitable for the selling agent, Term is much more profitable for the insurance corporation office. Its quite the contradiction for termites to call WL a ripoff when, corporate wise, term generates more profits.Robert Barney, you are right on the money with your analysis. The reason the life insurance industry pushes whole life (and its variants) is one word "CASH." That's why whole life commissions can be 75% to 125% of the first year premium when term is, what, 15% or 20% with miniscule renewal commissions.
What good does a $10,000 whole life policy do for a young parent's family when the same premium can buy 6 figures worth of term insurance?
Absolutely.
Full disclosure: I'm remembering commission rates from decades ago when agents were threatened with termination for writing term insurance. I had no idea that the life insurance industry had done a flip-flop.
Like a lot of them, their limited experience somehow makes them experts.
When one's licensing bestows the title of "fiduciary"... somehow it makes them an expert with their opinions
While selling Whole Life may be more profitable for the selling agent, Term is much more profitable for the insurance corporation office. Its quite the contradiction for termites to call WL a ripoff when, corporate wise, term generates more profits.
Most Term policies do not pay out. They term out and all premium collected has been mostly profit or bonus's for insurance agencies and companies. Whole life policies pay death benefitsSo where do you get this idea that term is more profitable for the company?
I do not agree.
So where do you get this idea that term is more profitable for the company?
I do not agree.