You didn't start out with "for convenience". You started out with simply saying "it doesn't happen."
Then you challenged us to show you a case where it had happened. I did. That's when you switched up to "happened for convenience".
So, I've had my say and given you facts, which are indisputable. So we're just left with our opinions about the facts. If you're good with things as they are, so be it. I'm not. But I am fine with us having a friendly disagreement.
I'm sorry that I was not clear from the very beginning. However, in my defense, we were talking about the bills (or whatever they were) that passed and what it has or hasn't caused. I was not commenting on anything that happened before those were passed.
So yes, you gave some facts, but not the facts I was talking about.