Phyllis Christos
Expert
- 49
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We can't have bank employees (so called financial advisors) lying to and stealing from unsuspecting customers in United States of America.
If you had two separate contracts you both would have likely still been protected and the agent would have made the same money.The lie is that they said the money was fully protected (up to 500K) by the State Guaranty Association as long as 2 owners were listed on the policy. That is, they told us we were EACH covered for 250K. That's the lie.
If they made a deliberate misrepresentation about the guaranty fund in order to entice the customer to buy the annuity so they could draw a commission, then that is not only lying but is fraud which is considered a type of theft.Lying? Maybe. You'd need more evidence that they knew this was going on in advance.
Stealing? Not if they funded the annuities they said they did. They did not pocket the funds to be invested. Therefore the thought of 'theft' or 'embezzlement' is not an appropriate charge to make.
Did they make fraudulent or misleading statements in the sale of these contracts? Perhaps... and that's the only charge that can stick in a possible complaint.
Of course, this is not legal or compliance advice.
If you have proof of that you can easily win a suit against the bank. I don’t doubt that they told you that. If enough people have the same story it seems like a lawyer would take that case.The lie is that they said the money was fully protected (up to 500K) by the State Guaranty Association as long as 2 owners were listed on the policy. That is, they told us we were EACH covered for 250K. That's the lie.