- 10,724
In my opinion the AM Best Rating system is designed more to sell ratings to insurance companies than it is to protect consumers with information they can easily understand.
It would translate better to the lay person (and to agents) if it followed our old school report card system that we are all familiar with.
A and A+ would be excellent. There is no need for an A++ or an A-. Those just add to the confusion.
B and B+ would indicate Good or better than average
C = average
D = Failing
F = Failed
That's all we need. They use A++, A+, A, A-, B++, etc. so by the time they get to C which should mean average it really means the boat is sinking. B- should mean above average but it really means This one is failing out.
It would hard to sell C-ratings to companies for a LOT of money. So they mix it up and sell them a B+ that really means average but most people can't figure that out. You even hear agents say they consider ANY thing in the A range (meaning A-) is all the same to them. Really? An AM Best A- is the same as an A+?
The whole goal of the AM Best rating system is to sell ratings to insurance companies at a hefty price tag. Maybe insurance companies should have to disclose on their website how much money they paid AM Best to be rated. That would help people understand the system they are relying on a little better.
This x1000. AMBest is designed to give insurers the best looking rating possible.
They consistently rate carriers with an A when others rate them as a B.
If an insurer only has an AMBest rating, there is a reason for that.
I wish the big insurers would just shun AMBest. If they took a stand and called out their bs ratings, maybe they would change their shady business practices. That might be a strong statement to call them shady... but when your ratings give the appearance of safety when others say its not... its shady.
Imo, Weiss is the easiest to understand. They use just A,B,C,D.
CB Life had a C.