- 4,686
All things considered, price IS the #1 factor for most out there. Justifying making these folks pay even $6 more per month because you're a super nice, thoughtful agent...is faulty behavior in my opinion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't have a dog in this one, just being entertained and trying to keep score:
Rearden: believes couple buck's difference won't make most FE policy holders to switch, believes in selling yourself vs pure price
JDeasy: couldn't disagree more…says vast majority of FE clients will bail for a couple bucks premium…if he can get $1500 more coverage for the same price, that's an easy sale…doesn't like snide comments against selling on price…honors the "art of selling" (PaperHanger comment: but JD in the past has stated that he is not a great salesperson…he just uncovers the problem and offers a solution)
Rearden: asks if he would be able to easily replace a JD client with a $1000 more face for the same price
JDeasy: Disagrees….No way, hose'
Rearden: my point is proven…it isn't so easy to sell on price alone, you must also sell yourself
JDeasy: doesn't see the point made…he sells "Value", not "Price". He recommends a "Value" carrier, but will write the best "Price" if the client wants it.
However, he does not see any value in a carrier with a higher price for a DE client. (PaperHanger comment: So, inversely I come behind an agent with my higher price but better 'value' and easily replace lower priced policies with my higher priced/value policies?)
Jbbarea: attempts to agree with JD, that price alone should never be the determining factor in purchase decision.
JDeasy: disagrees yet again…seems to be implying that price alone should (PH: sometimes/always/never ??) be the determining factor??…
PH:....I haven't been more confused since the Bill Clinton testimony...I suppose it depends on which definition of the word "Is" is used... ??
I don't have a dog in this one, just being entertained and trying to keep score: Rearden: believes couple buck's difference won't make most FE policy holders to switch, believes in selling yourself vs pure price JDeasy: couldn't disagree more…says vast majority of FE clients will bail for a couple bucks premium…if he can get $1500 more coverage for the same price, that's an easy sale…doesn't like snide comments against selling on price…honors the "art of selling" (PaperHanger comment: but JD in the past has stated that he is not a great salesperson…he just uncovers the problem and offers a solution) Rearden: asks if he would be able to easily replace a JD client with a $1000 more face for the same price JDeasy: Disagrees….No way, hose' Rearden: my point is proven…it isn't so easy to sell on price alone, you must also sell yourself JDeasy: doesn't see the point made…he sells "Value", not "Price". He recommends a "Value" carrier, but will write the best "Price" if the client wants it. However, he does not see any value in a carrier with a higher price for a DE client. (PaperHanger comment: So, inversely I come behind an agent with my higher price but better 'value' and easily replace lower priced policies with my higher priced/value policies?) Jbbarea: attempts to agree with JD, that price alone should never be the determining factor in purchase decision. JDeasy: disagrees yet again…seems to be implying that price alone should (PH: sometimes/always/never ??) be the determining factor??… PH:....I haven't been more confused since the Bill Clinton testimony...I suppose it depends on which definition of the word "Is" is used... ??
I don't have a dog in this one, just being entertained and trying to keep score:
Rearden: believes couple buck's difference won't make most FE policy holders to switch, believes in selling yourself vs pure price
JDeasy: couldn't disagree more…says vast majority of FE clients will bail for a couple bucks premium…if he can get $1500 more coverage for the same price, that's an easy sale…doesn't like snide comments against selling on price…honors the "art of selling" (PaperHanger comment: but JD in the past has stated that he is not a great salesperson…he just uncovers the problem and offers a solution)
Rearden: asks if he would be able to easily replace a JD client with a $1000 more face for the same price
JDeasy: Disagrees….No way, hose'
Rearden: my point is proven…it isn't so easy to sell on price alone, you must also sell yourself
JDeasy: doesn't see the point made…he sells "Value", not "Price". He recommends a "Value" carrier, but will write the best "Price" if the client wants it.
However, he does not see any value in a carrier with a higher price for a DE client. (PaperHanger comment: So, inversely I come behind an agent with my higher price but better 'value' and easily replace lower priced policies with my higher priced/value policies?)
Jbbarea: attempts to agree with JD, that price alone should never be the determining factor in purchase decision.
JDeasy: disagrees yet again…seems to be implying that price alone should (PH: sometimes/always/never ??) be the determining factor??…
PH:....I haven't been more confused since the Bill Clinton testimony...I suppose it depends on which definition of the word "Is" is used... ??