- Thread starter
- #21
Jason Hall
New Member
- 15
Who the hell needs or wants AmAm?
I guess it's pretty popular for telesales because of their voice signature.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who the hell needs or wants AmAm?
Thats assuming they get preferred with kskj . Slac won't take anyone on disability nor many ailments so that knocks out a ton . Lifeshield has very strict underwriting . Neither of the last 2 carriers will touch inhalers . They both got very strict ht/wt . I have contract with both and rarely right . If kskj were in my state I'd write it . Gcu has crap billing but i use for ages 50-60.
Thats assuming they get preferred with kskj . Slac won't take anyone on disability nor many ailments so that knocks out a ton . Lifeshield has very strict underwriting . Neither of the last 2 carriers will touch inhalers . They both got very strict ht/wt . I have contract with both and rarely right . If kskj were in my state I'd write it . Gcu has crap billing but i use for ages 50-60.
Lol . We can agree to disagree right JD? If you didn't have kskj what would your go to be ?
Hey David, thanks for replying. FFL has this lengthy one-sided release contract in order to release anything and it must be signed by the agent and the new IMO. It's pretty ugly. The carrier in particular is AmAm, but again, FFL won't release any carriers without this one-sided contract signed.
For Aetna, I was just planning on waiting for 6 months with no activity. Is this okay, or is there something I should do differently?
That sounds like a reciprocal release agreement. Nothing unusual about that at all. I'm sure the new IMO would sign it.
I already checked. They won't sign it. The agreement basically says that I can't sue them, but if I publicly criticize them (which they could say I'm doing now, but that's not my intent), they could sue me and I would be responsible for all of their "reasonable" attorney fees, which we know are never reasonable.
Needing to be released from a contract you didn't sign is a dirty deal between the companies and the IMO's. Crooked piece of sh!t IMO's won't release.
It won't stand up in court but by the time you get a ruling on it 6 months will have passed. They know that so they just do it anyway.
Dirty, lying, cheating scumbag IMO's!!. Never, ever contract with an IMO that won't release!!
But to answer your question, they can only hold up the contracts you were dumb enough to put under the liars.
Contracts you have elsewhere they can't rob.
It must be just with your particular upline, because we've gotten many releases from FFL for agents leaving them.