Free Backlink Tool

[Pangaea]

This is different from an auto-pinger.

The thing pangea had up was a curl scripting tool that basically submitted your site to speed reviews etc, over and over, and caused them to show that you had accessed them, which basically gets you crawled by google faster because of activity but doesn't do much to overall page rank or search engine result placement.

This one claims to give you a bunch of places to put links that should be perminent, probably with some amount of text.

The problem you get into with autolinkers in general is that prebuilt ones do tend to get used a lot, if they get popular that means that tons of people use them, if tons of people use them then the link quality is diluted, etc.

The "best" link to have is a single link from a pr10 website with no other external links talking about your topic.

More links outbound on a page or domain, with lower pr, the less its worth.

To get the very best in links, you basically have to use scrapers, then manually post or automate based on footprints, which is a tedious task that requires programming.

You can go dig around on say a SEO forum, and look at the products those guys use, but in the forums they hide from the rabble there are people talking about custom software they build on linux systems to link in a totally different way from everyone else, or uses for scrapebox and other tools that are not the same strategy everyone else uses.

All marketing is the same, by the time you copy the successful strategy, you're putting yourself into the same category as all the other copycats, so the results are diluted. You're getting the scraps.

The guys that come out in front with the new strategies, they get the highest amount of benefits, but take the most risks.

Somarco isn't talking about an autopinger. It's something I never mentioned on the forum

 

[YouGotMyMoney]

FWIW...the best linking ideas, lead sources, high PR blog finding techniques are not found on any post on this Forum...or most other Forums.

The posts are fun to read though.

elaborate chumps elaborate

 

[CHUMPS FROM OXFORD]

Well...what I meant was...and I'll use you or I as an example...If you find a do-follow PR7 insurance-related blog with very few comments...are we going to post this on Warrior Forum or here? I doubt it.

Maybe we'll exchange the info between ourselves but the last thing we want is the thing spammed to death.

Or another powerful link that is relatively unknown.

Something like that.

 

[ksigmtsu]

Sadly tho chumps, I can go get every link you ever posted to any of your sites by farming them down, that's one of the comedies of knowing how to use those tools properly.

Smart guy searches google for their top 20 competitors, then searches for their url to find places they posted, in addition to posting on relevant sites and works their ass off to get rank.

Smarter guy searches google, takes the top 20 properties for any term they want to rank for, then scrapes all their links, filters them by PR, then goes and takes every available link that has a place for a backlink to be posted by going and looking at the sites.

Double smartiest guy programs a crontab php scraper with a proxy list to use multi-curl to grab results from all search engines for all the terms they want to rank for and finds the ones with <form> elements on the page before they go look..

All the link posting tools and tricks in the world won't hide you, because your links have to be posted someplace pointed at something, and all you have to do is recurse the structure, and you have the whole tree.

Thats the "holy grail" of linking, problem is, most people do not have the ability to even understand the code involved in doing it, its a moving target, and the footprints change constantly.

In THEORY you could fully automate that, using spintax parsers, post collectors, and combined spinners, but you likely would get beat by the human elements, so you do still have to manually put the posts out there.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Just think, if you steal all your competitors links, then add 1, you're more important.

 

[CHUMPS FROM OXFORD]

I encourage anybody to harvest ALL of my links because most are worthless and some of the ones that appear worthwhile aren't (due to that goofy masking software).
And as any SEO expert will tell you (and both you and I are NOT EVEN CLOSE to being one)...content rules no matter how many links you have or the quality of the links.

 

[ksigmtsu]

Oh I'm not saying that building a site without hitting content metrics is good.

Nor is failure to calculate onsite seo, but in terms of backlinking, what I just said is basically 1 step away from winning.

I don't know if I'd call anyone doing SEO an expert, but I have managed to hit national keywords on page 1 within 2 weeks on sites I built, I did the code, and I did 100% of the content, and all the linking.

It is difficult to be an expert on any topic where the rules can change daily (and often do).

 

[YouGotMyMoney]

It is difficult to be an expert on any topic where the rules can change daily (and often do).

it's one thing to be a life or health insurance expert, you can be an expert on health insurance (not bob vineyard level, but normal expert) just reading the posts on this forum....

but google is a ever changing monopoly, there are definitely strategies that work over and over, but doing the seo is really a full time job.

 

[somarco]

Are you suggesting I am not normal?