- 5,305
What if the cost per lead was $60 on an $800 investment -- that's 13 leads (roughly) -- what if you close 6 and your average sales is $700AP?
Point is... cost per lead is an over-obsessed number. What if you get a .2% response (2 out of 1000) and close 75% of the time on an average of $700AP, versus a 1.2% response (12 out of 1000) and close 20% to 25%?) using the same average? Every system has its slower-producing weeks.
Businessmen should concern themselves with return on capital/investment and time invested to realize that return.
It's like saying Widgets 'r' Us spent $200 million on advertising last year and concluding they made a bad decision without analyzing sales and net income.
I do agree the beginning agent does get the edge from contracting with a lead-subsidizing IMO as there is lower barriers to entry, a decent marketing system, and sales mentoring, all very valuable in my opinion.
Point is... cost per lead is an over-obsessed number. What if you get a .2% response (2 out of 1000) and close 75% of the time on an average of $700AP, versus a 1.2% response (12 out of 1000) and close 20% to 25%?) using the same average? Every system has its slower-producing weeks.
Businessmen should concern themselves with return on capital/investment and time invested to realize that return.
It's like saying Widgets 'r' Us spent $200 million on advertising last year and concluding they made a bad decision without analyzing sales and net income.
I do agree the beginning agent does get the edge from contracting with a lead-subsidizing IMO as there is lower barriers to entry, a decent marketing system, and sales mentoring, all very valuable in my opinion.
Last edited: