- 1,797
The up front premium monthly cost for PDP's next year for the insureds is a concern with the approval of Wegovy and the $2000 maximum out of pocket Rx costs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The up front premium monthly cost for PDP's next year for the insureds is a concern with the approval of Wegovy and the $2000 maximum out of pocket Rx costs.
I'm sorry, but I'm confused on what an integrated SNP is? Are you saying they will have Medicaid through a specific carrier?Yes lis/ partial Medicaid will have same seps as regular people . Oep/ aep etc . How I also read is unless a dsnp enrolls in a “ integrated “ dsnp which they can do monthly they also have the regular seps . But a fair warning what’s taking place . Cms wants all dsnps to eventually be “ integrated “ . This means the dsnp will have Medicaid / mapd with same carrier for total integration. It’s happening in Indiana next yr . What this means if you run into an Anthem dsnp they will have anthem Medicaid and mapd . It means unless you live there Medicaid first ti let’s say United you can’t move there dsnp . It affectively ends writing dsnps . But if you have a big dsnp book it’s good as retention will be much higher . Also a person who has Medicaid and gets Medicare will be auto enrolled in a “ integrated “ plan . So no more running into that given nugget were somebody just has Medicare /medicaid . Games getting tougher
That would be true however it’s the government that pays the bills. No free market existsSaying companies shouldn't earn more than a certain amount misses how the free market naturally works. It's like forgetting that the chance to make more money pushes companies to come up with new ideas and value ads, that competing FMO’s helps keep margins fair, and that when companies do well. Basically, companies should be free to make as much as they can because their success means they're doing what people want and like.
Let's be clear: our deals with an FMO should be reflecting our actual value based on production levels, number of agents, and overall contribution. For instance, if I'm funneling 1000 applications a month their way, it's only reasonable they earn, say, $25 per app. But if I'm only managing to sell 4 apps a month, then sure, let them take $300 per app. Our earnings should mirror what the market dictates, not be tethered to some arbitrary figure an agent dreams up as their worth.
Sorry but @Packerland is correct. The gubment doesn't pay anything. Taxpayers do. But the gubment is damn good at running those bills up.That would be true however it’s the government that pays the bills. No free market exists
Sorry but @Packerland is correct. The gubment doesn't pay anything. Taxpayers do. But the gubment is damn good at running those bills up.
And everything is based on free markets. That's why socialism never works.
And both are going broke.Ironically, Medicare and Social Security, are socialist programs
No it’s not owed to me . And fmo overrides for doing jack crap aren’t owed either . Apparently cms agrees . I love watching all these fmo’s on facebook squirmYou seem to be looking at the marketing money as something you earn or rightly deserve. It's not, it's a bonus. It was never something that was written in stone, so it's volatile. No one owes it to you.
Yes that’s what cms is aiming for . I’m not in a state that does that . Apparently the carrier handles the integration of the Medicaid and carrier bills . The carrier handles the integration f care. Supposedly in Fla were the integration works that way you can still move an integrated plan and both the Medicaid and plan move together. I was told in some states you must move the Medicaid first. But the Fla model makes more sense so maybe that’s how it worksI'm sorry, but I'm confused on what an integrated SNP is? Are you saying they will have Medicaid through a specific carrier?