I'm sorry if I offended anyone in this forum. Everyone here is probably well respected in their communities. This is starting to be a tennis match for me, and I want to change my approach to a constructive point of view. I had a very bad experience with an AGLA agent who was trying to replace policies on my books. I didn't like his approach. This is my 1st experience going head to head with an AGLA IUL product. However I have seen many IUL, especially from stock companies or PNC insurance companies. So far, these policies are all the same no matter how you put it. My opinion is that it shouldn't be considered long term instruments. Plus I don't think it's possible to have these policies supplement retirement income. IUL can still be a great product. I would recommend it on younger clients rather than old clients or replacements. Still, I think it should be backed up by a smaller WL policy with riders that lock in the client's insurability. That way should the IUL not perform to its illustration, and I have seen many, the client has an opportunity to increase his WL and drop the IUL using a 1035 exchange. I'm not sure how your company's culture is, but with experience there are some things that we as agents need to think hard about. My suggestion to the green agent is to get in, work the field, and get your experience, because in this industry you're not taught everything. You need to learn it for yourself. BEWARE OF THE KOOL-AID. Every company serves their exclusive flavor. thanks
The issue isn't with any particular product. At least not for me. I don't work for AGLA. I am independent and have been for 14 years now. The issue is the following statements:
AGLA is AIG.....AGLA policyholders are not told everything. I wouldn't trust a company that needed a bailout.
AGLA is NOT AIG. AIG is a conglomerate of companies. AIG is nothing more than a holding company for all of these other companies. They own life insurance companies, property and casualty companies, finance companies, broker dealers, variable product companies, a mutual fund company and more. Do a little research and you'd know this. AGLA operates independently of AIG just as all the other companies AIG owns does. They have their own P&L statements. To say that AGLA received bailout money is a complete lie. One extremely small subsidiary created the mess that caused the problems with AIG.
You can bad mouth a company all you want, just don't lie about them.