- Thread starter
- #11
- 10,826
I am no expert on this, but I think you are looking at it wrong.
Yes, Google dominates search but Bing at 10% or so isn't all bad. If you have to spend $40 for above the fold pg 1 on Google but $4 for the same position on Bing, which is going to generate a better ROI?
Ive had the same thoughts.
To amend what I said earlier, $40 was the suggested bid. So it wouldnt be $40 per click each time. The traffic estimates are coming out with clicks around $4-$6 for those keywords.
But the whole thing just seems ridiculous to an extent. I have a feeling that those estimates are close to useless.
I looked into Bing ads a bit last night and it is a much more simple interface than google. But no traffic estimates (as shady as they may be). I will probably try both and see which performs better.
----------
Have a highly targeted landing page. Do not trust any of Google's estimates. Google only cares about making Google money. Do not bid $40 on a keyword. U will get crushed. Quickly.
I dont plan to. I plan on keeping bids fairly low.
Are you finding success with highly targeted keywords? Or more general keywords?
Last edited: