- 19,648
I hate it that they did that but nothing I could do. Most agents look at it the way Newby described so I was a voice in the wolderness against it. Had more agents opposed it they might have done it differently.
Rearden- Update
- Thread starter coop123
- Start date
I hate it that they did that but nothing I could do. Most agents look at it the way Newby described so I was a voice in the wolderness against it. Had more agents opposed it they might have done it differently.
- 264
I don't understand - with anyone else Americo 115% with renewal is standard and with EFES no renewal - where would this money go? It would make sense if EFES was able to negotiate something sweeter or make contracted agents more competitive that loaded the front end. Economically this doesn't make much sense.
Last edited:
- 19,648
With anyone else they are not subsidizing your leads.
- 264
A broker with EFES does not have subsidized leads but yet they lose renewals. Not to their advantage to do this.
- 19,648
- 5,305
No taste for gambling at the moment.
Prefer the fundamentals.
Securus is a decent company if you know who to contract with.
Prefer the fundamentals.
Securus is a decent company if you know who to contract with.
I'm new to FE and seriously considering EFES, could you please clarify these 2 sentences for me?
Thank you and good luck with Securus.
- 19,648
I don't want to pretend to speak for David but I think he meant the gambling of doing his own mail.
Thanks, JD. I thought that might be the case and "fundamentals" may be door knocking.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Los Angeles Fires Become Existential Test for California’s Stopgap Insurer- Latest: marindependent
-
