Selling for Multiple IMO/FMO'S

[jdeasy]

So then, you're saying that Scott was wrong to fire JG (for everyone on the Forum to see) for wanting a release on one contract?

You are more than fishing today. You're chumming.

 

[pcbinsurance]

Instead of the famed Monkey "Chim-Chim" on Speed Racer, we can name Illini "Chum-Chum".

 

[goillini52]

You are more than fishing today. You're chumming.

I've got lots of bait...

----------

Instead of the famed Monkey "Chim-Chim" on Speed Racer, we can name Illini "Chum-Chum".

I guess that would be better than Chump- Chump.

Go Speed Racer, Go.............

 

[senior-advisor-indiana]

Hahaha...Scott had said in the past that to have access to 'The Call" that you had to have the bulk of your contracts with him. He must've made an exception for you.

I am an asset to everybody I have contracts though.

 

[GreenSky]

But I'm pretty sure I'm correct in which case I think I'm owed the apology.

Welcome to the club.

Rick

 

[Norwayguy]

Hahaha...Scott had said in the past that to have access to 'The Call" that you had to have the bulk of your contracts with him. He must've made an exception for you.

Well according to Rick he only writes 4 policies a year so if he wrote 2 with FEX then that would be Tha majority.

 

[goillini52]

Well according to Rick he only writes 4 policies a year so if he wrote 2 with FEX then that would be Tha majority.

I can't comment.......don't want to get banned.

 

[John Galt]

Scott never fired JG for requesting to move one contract. 1. Scott called JG twice to suggest that he move under Ben since they had become best friends and Ben had the same contracts available that he had with us.

2. JG never took my calls. Then JG goes public on the forum saying he had been trying to be released for two weeks and wouldn't release him. It had been 2 days from his first email request and I had called him twice.

3. I gave him no choice to stay with us because I considered that aisles attack on our character.

I'm not going to participate ion 20 pages of back and forth but if JG can produce an email that is dated two weeks prior to him coming on the forum with that I'm man enough to publicly apologize. 4. But I'm pretty sure I'm correct in which case I think I'm owed the apology.

Allow the chronological order of the numbers to equate to the above highlighted points:

1. That is as captive as it gets....According to Travis I have no friends so thanks for allowing me to have at least one

2. You never returned any emails....ever. When you call a phone number it is usually wise to leave a message.

3. Characters are like...well you know...opinions, everyone has one and everyone is entitled to defend theirs, you and me included. But jeesh, still feels a little like "captivity".

4. SCOTT, I am soooooooo sorry I hurt your feelings. But since I am writing a butt load of business I am not gonna search for any emails. It would not change anything anyway.

Thanks for coming to the party.

360 rules!!!!!!!!!

----------

I can't comment.......don't want to get banned.

You better watch it son, you gonna get the ban hammer

 

[rousemark]

Well according to Rick he only writes 4 policies a year so if he wrote 2 with FEX then that would be Tha majority.

That would not be a majority.. That would only be 50%. A majority is 50% plus one...

 

[Norwayguy]

That would not be a majority.. That would only be 50%. A majority is 50% plus one...

Yeah but we all know agents inflate their numbers so if he says 4 and the agency gets 2 that's the majority of his business.