Why Are Agents Rude....

[DHK]

"Professional" is in the eye of the beholder. Obviously, the OP doesn't think of me in that way.


Although it was interesting that everyone else in the thread *assumed* it was the FE forum!

Trust, but verify.

 

[rousemark]

"Professional" is in the eye of the beholder. Obviously, the OP doesn't think of me in that way.


Although it was interesting that everyone else in the thread *assumed* it was the FE forum!

Trust, but verify.

Now I know why the FE guys keep telling you to stay out of the FE forum.. You are a troublemaker and disrupt the genteel nature of that forum..

 

[DHK]

Well, for all the trouble and inconvenience I caused... I'm willing to offer a complete refund per the satisfaction guarantee clause within my marketing consulting retainer agreement.

Oh wait...

 

[scagnt83]

For the record, you are confirming that your are justifying your unprofessional comment of relating my promotional activities on the sordid level of a "pimp."

Is that the type of language I should expect from a self-described professional bemoaning the negative behaviors of a select few forum members?

Please describe to me how that is not an example of hypocrisy. Again, I am not intending to personally attack you. I just don't understand how you can claim professionalism when you are lumping me, an otherwise observer of said unprofessional actions in the forum, as on the level of a "pimp," as such vitriol is not what one would expect from a professional.



Lots of unfounded hypotheses and assumptions, none of which you can prove nor can I prove, either.

All I know is that the Forum is indexed based on search-engine terms that relate to highly-visited content relevant to the purpose of the forum, which is to expand a knowledge base of final expense sales related content.

That's what drives people in in the first place. And like all social groups (as the Final Expense forum is one), they develop their own social mores.

While I am certainly do not embrace much of the virtual fistfights that occur, many of what is commonly thought of as "immature" or "negative," needs to be inspected for further review, and much of it is more like "tough love."

Nevertheless, I can only attest for my interaction, and I believe a positive, transparent, and non-negative interaction with members and future members is the most pleasant (and profitable) course of action for myself.



If you are alleging guilt by association, then most certainly every time you log into the forum and read the comments from people you scorn for their bad behavior puts you on the exact level I'm at.

Your allegation is baseless. But once you cancel your Insurance Forum account and agree to never again visit the site, I will take your claim seriously.



I will admit there have been some occurrences that have crossed the line where "tough love" could have been handled much better and with more professionalism in the Final Expense forum.

We really need the Fight Club back and in full force.

If you feel the need to reply to that comment in this detail then you certainly fit the bill. Either that or you misunderstand my point.

There are plenty of vendors on this site who know good and well that what I said does not apply to them. I even spoke with an joked with a couple of them tonight after this thread exploded by 2 pages in an hour.

The reason I responded is that you directly profit by the drama. So your view is not exactly "non-biased". I feel no need to fight with you and have never had an issue with you before. Of course your response is fairly telling.

 

[John Galt]

And that the truth Rouse. BTW, lots of fisherman on the forum have forgot how to bait their hooks correctly lol

----------

Well, for all the trouble and inconvenience I caused... I'm willing to offer a complete refund per the satisfaction guarantee clause within my marketing consulting retainer agreement.

Oh wait...

Ill call your refund and match it with not only refunds I charged for the multitude of free videos and agent interviews I have posted, yea thats not any work at all.... Ill also refund Reardens charges for his vast number of videos....oh wait!! What??

 

[scagnt83]

No kidding, over here Ive been called a D**K, trash and some other homophobic comment about measuring man parts, YAK!! I thought for sure it might be different here, nope.

All you seem to understand is your own level of talk. And I dont care enough about you to take the extra time to paste the code.

 

[John Galt]

Someone is talking to me but I cant hear them, must be a draft.

 

[scagnt83]

Ah,,, Hatfield v McCoys (fex v 360), fex v bboman, Thad v JD, Gooner v Newby, JG v , (may not be mentioned) v everyone, Unicorn v ,

Yep, but me calling out illegal marketing practices and constant personal attacks is worse I guess.

God forbid we even mention the sales practices... or even the needs basis for their situation. Who cares what a person needs... as long as the agent is making money all is well in the world and we shouldnt bother a good man trying to make money no matter how them come by it.

 

[HoosierLife]

Ah,,, Hatfield v McCoys (fex v 360), fex v bboman, Thad v JD, Gooner v Newby, JG v , (may not be mentioned) v everyone, Unicorn v ,

Man I didn't even make the short list??

 

[scagnt83]

Man I didn't even make the short list??

Wino includes you in the traditional life club as well as the FE club. He told me that you might even buy a Par WL one day.