I will start by saying I have read language around fraud, et cetera, and realize the impact such fraud can have when a carrier attempts to deny payout. I have worked long enough in the insurance business (not in placement), I annoy everyone I know with the mantra that a carrier will spend 9K not to give you 10k.
I also wouldn't ask any of you to violate professional conduct nor policy T&C, so this is of course a request for general advice.
So here's the hypothetical: I am applying for a big term policy with USAA. I have in the past smoked both cigarettes and marijuana, clean now by several years and very stable - family, good income, et cetera. I also know that USAA tends to be very strict about uprating policies based on certain conditions/criteria. I have never had legal issues with my habits, and only really had allergy related asthma that went away 90% once I realized cats should (and can!) live outside. I am certain that my smoking came up when my asthma was first diagnose (2003) so I know disclosing that is no brainer - and will take my lumps. But, in regards to marijuana, there is only a slight chance I mentioned it offhand to my current physician - so no idea whether or not it shows up in my record - and if I did it would have been over 5 years ago at least.
So which is the most prudent decision: shop around with full disclosure with independent agents or take my chances with a lower term with USAA - with or without full disclosure? I've already started, but not finiished, my application with them and was very confident in my full disclosure choice until I started weighing the impact of a rejected application/MIB.
Since this is of course hypothetical, what would be your advice?
I would love to bring my business to a local agent, but I think/hope USAA rates may preclude that.
Thanks,
Tex in TX
I also wouldn't ask any of you to violate professional conduct nor policy T&C, so this is of course a request for general advice.
So here's the hypothetical: I am applying for a big term policy with USAA. I have in the past smoked both cigarettes and marijuana, clean now by several years and very stable - family, good income, et cetera. I also know that USAA tends to be very strict about uprating policies based on certain conditions/criteria. I have never had legal issues with my habits, and only really had allergy related asthma that went away 90% once I realized cats should (and can!) live outside. I am certain that my smoking came up when my asthma was first diagnose (2003) so I know disclosing that is no brainer - and will take my lumps. But, in regards to marijuana, there is only a slight chance I mentioned it offhand to my current physician - so no idea whether or not it shows up in my record - and if I did it would have been over 5 years ago at least.
So which is the most prudent decision: shop around with full disclosure with independent agents or take my chances with a lower term with USAA - with or without full disclosure? I've already started, but not finiished, my application with them and was very confident in my full disclosure choice until I started weighing the impact of a rejected application/MIB.
Since this is of course hypothetical, what would be your advice?
I would love to bring my business to a local agent, but I think/hope USAA rates may preclude that.
Thanks,
Tex in TX