- 166
When I talk about my domain name I talk mainly about "Google SERP Computers" type of traffic. SO. When you do the math, you have to use relevant pricing ($35-$40) instead of the average price ($12-$13) of rubbish traffic and high quality traffic. But I can accept the $12-$13 pricing too.
If you can establish that traffic for this keyword costs $35 then the value of your traffic jumps to $250,000 for one year of your traffic.
OH MY GOD!!! You got my point!!! Maaaannnn... I really stand you a beer! Thank you!
I am under impression that $70K is still not too much money for this thing. I will drop, if the buyer will accept the risk of bypassing escrow. I will drop even more (to $50K) if buyer will accept more risk.
Why are you dropping your price when in the statement above you are implying that the true value is much higher?
They are monstrous companies, and aren't really interested in a brook of traffic, they want a freaking Niagara, preferably for a buck.
That sounds like an assumption/excuse designed to help you avoid picking up the phone and calling someone with the budget and authority to spend real money.
A sharp marketer will respond to an opportunity to cut marketing costs by $50K to $100K annually. Your site presents an opportunity to purchase traffic flow that today costs $250,000 and getting it instead for something less, with the opportunity to drive costs lower over time. With some additional investment in promotion and site redesign the brook of traffic can easily grow into a river - driving traffic costs lower over time.
Last edited: