I am about to send theinsuranceman a PM to check my figures, but it looks to me like mathematically you can come out ahead using his method. I ran some numbers that may be on the generous side, and the thing that puts you over the top his way is the sheer number of people you can talk to.
His way is sort of an outside the box approach to FE sales, almost literally, in that you can be licensed in multiple states and have an almost immediate supply of interested leads each day/week to work, and you're not bound by where you or the prospect live.
The lower commission and cost of leadscan be offset by sheer volume.
Now, the one thing I did not factor in was your ability to cross sell, which is a big part of face to face selling. And I didn't factor in any renewals or lapses/chargebacks for the numbers I ran, which I know are a big part of this argument. But, other things being equal, you can get an apples to apples comparison without factoring that in anywhere.
So, my point is, insuranceman has been pretty much taken to the woodshed on his method, but I am seeing where it could work out pretty well.
His way is sort of an outside the box approach to FE sales, almost literally, in that you can be licensed in multiple states and have an almost immediate supply of interested leads each day/week to work, and you're not bound by where you or the prospect live.
The lower commission and cost of leadscan be offset by sheer volume.
Now, the one thing I did not factor in was your ability to cross sell, which is a big part of face to face selling. And I didn't factor in any renewals or lapses/chargebacks for the numbers I ran, which I know are a big part of this argument. But, other things being equal, you can get an apples to apples comparison without factoring that in anywhere.
So, my point is, insuranceman has been pretty much taken to the woodshed on his method, but I am seeing where it could work out pretty well.