- 19,578
I know you're experienced at this, why would you consider these companies a "worse line up?"
I had to go back and look at what companies were mentioned. Those are just bad choices. Mofo is terrible. They might have an occasional good rate but then you still have to deal with Mofo.
AmAm is in the worst 3 companies I've ever dealt with. And their rates are terrible so there's no reason to deal with them anyway. Foresters rates are too high. and you still have to do a phone interview in 2023. Servicing your clients is almost impossible with them. Trans shouldn't need an explanation. AIG does nothing that others don't do far better.
But I was wrong in saying he couldn't have picked worse, he could have had SNL in there. As I told SNL yesterday, "I have never worked with a worse company". And I haven't. So at least they didn't chose them.
At our annual meetings and on our calls and chats I have always advised agents to work with companies that make your job easier, not harder. None make it easy. But many make it harder. New kid on the block, CICA, is just determined to make things hard. Another new kid, PFA, seems to want to make it easier. But I only have them in one state so not enough data yet.
That list will be different by agent. Some agents find Trinity/FBL easier to deal with. I don't. And some companies that you would like to write are just too high on pricing or too difficult to get placed there. I would like to write more CinnEq. But their pricing is just too far out of line and they don't have any underwriting niches to justify using them. They keep saying they are going to improve and they hired a guy a year ago that should help in that direction but so far it hasn't happened. There's one person at CinnEq that calls all the shots and until and unless he leaves there won't be significant changes.