I have read the discussion between OHinsAGNT and moonlightandmargaritas with great interest. However, I am really surprised at the position Paul has taken. He is a well respected member of this forum and one who I thought was more open minded than this thread indicates. He may just be trying to "make his point". I think we all do that sometimes.
There is more than one way to work efficiently, yes I said efficiently as well as effectively, in this business. I'm sure Paul has the system he is most comfortable with and the one he believes that gives him the greatest degree of success. However, I think he has lost sight of the fact that each agent/person is unique unto himself. No two people follow the same exact path to success, nor is there just one path to follow.
I agree totally with OHinsAGNT. Cold calling is tremendously effcetive and has been the main thrust of my marketing emphasis for the last fifteen years. I have tried telemarked leads, internet leads, hiring a telemarketer, newspaper ads, direct mail, joining groups for lunch meetings, giving seminars, knocking on doors and stopping strangers on the street and saying "you don't want to buy any insurance do you"? Well maybe not the last one, but almost.
Each time I tried one of those methods to secure new clients I saw a healthy percent of my profits going out the window which meant that I had to sell at least twice as many purchased "leads" to make the same money that I would have if I had done my own marketing. That just didn't make sense to me. I'm greedy but I'm also good. I want to keep "all" my money.
I believe that OHinsAGNT pointed out that "they are no more effective than a well targeted list with a good cold caller". I think there in is the main difference in what OHinsAGNT is talking about, "well targeted" and "a good cold caller". Most agents I have worked with are not using a "well targeted list" nor are good at cold calling.
I'll go even further. I have targeted lists and I would not trade them for free internet leads.
In my experience of hiring and training agents a truely "good cold caller" is a very, very rare commodity. They almost don't exist today.
When cold calling is isn't about ROI it is all about numbers. How many calls, how many conversations and how many sales. My ROI, if I tried to compute it, would be "off the charts".
In my opinion the numbers really aren't worth keeping track of. I pick up the phone, make a few calls sell some insurance and put the money "in my pocket". That is all I need to know.
Cold calling, for me, is it is the easiest most effective, least time consuming, most profitable way of everything I have tried to secure new clients. But, I "give extremely good phone" and use only well targeted lists.
For those who don't there are always companies ready to take their money to help enable them to sell a policy. There is nothing wrong with that, I just think it is a waste of perfectly good money.
Cold-calling is all I do. I haven't knocked on a door, just knocking on doors, in 15-20 years. It's not that I can't sell that way...I have before, when I first started working for myself. I would just rather pick up the phone and call folks. I enjoy doing it, with a list of names that I'm sure aren't on the do-not-call list.