- 17,015
Why does someone in good health in their late 40's and into their 50's need final expense? They're not at the age where term and UL premiums go out of sight, and they're probably healthy enough to get a standard rate or better. If you told someone they had two options for the same exact coverage - take an exam, or don't take an exam, but if you don't take the exam, it'll cost you 2-3x more money every year, year after year after year, which do you think most would take? If you're looking at someone who is 70 years old, flat broke, and in poor health, ok.....but the post was in regards to prospects anywhere from their 40's into their 60's.
Why is guaranteed UL not a good fit when it provides a higher death benefit for the same amount of money the FE-gurus are trying to peddle? Hmm.......$15k or $50k....which would I rather have? Same price? Both are guaranteed? Give me the argument against that one.
You are correct for healthy 40 & 50 year olds. But that is not usually the final expense client. I'll sell them term or fully underwritten whole-life all day long. But that is not usually the final expense prospect.