- Thread starter
- #11
Colorado Newbie
Super Genius
- 243
100% agreed WITH a caveat. The only "perceived" liability about advances is if a GA/MGA, etc. with a larger work force is liable for commissions and they have unethical agents or ignorant by choice or laziness.
The argument between as-earned vs. advanced is comparable to the BTID debate, but doesn't take into account the time value of money and opportunity cost. Granted we're only talking about months and not years initially, but the argument is sound about using OPM.
Taking John's $10,000 AV per week estimated with a 20% commission leaves an agent with $2000 per week or $104,000 a year before taxes, savings, expenses, etc. One method could be:
20%-30% savings for taxes (individual tax bracket and state taxes impact this number) leaves you with $1400
30% for marketing leaves you with $980.
25% secured (12% of gross) in a separate "save investment account" for chargebacks leaves you with........
$735 left over for business and personal expenses, which can be broken down in more different categories.
After a few years the renewals will given you even more money to dump into marketing and work the same strategy allowing you to get into advanced applications.
I can see the comfort zone of having as-earned, but who in their right mind (if they weren't personally liable as a GA) would give up the chance to obtain an interest free loan with low risk.
Interest free loan? With advance commissions through both World and GR I am being a charged 1% monthly interest rate. I do not consider myself to have a 20% comm rate from World and GR I consider it to be 19%.
I am going as earned as soon as I can afford it!