- Thread starter
- #71
We can debate this until the end of time. These seniors you are referring to are adults. They are well capable of making their own decisions. I don't know of one senior citizen that I can bully into buying something they don't want. How many do you know?There's right and wrong and then there are "spin doctors " who will do anything to deflect when answering questions on this forum.
Upselling poorly educated low income senior citizens with products they did not ask for,agree to purchase,or anyway you want to spin it is just plain wrong. It costs the policy owner an extra $4-$7 a month and sometimes more for these unnecessary ad ons.
Senior Life and Lincoln Heritage rip our seniors off and deprive their beneficiaries of the extra death benefit they could receive without AD&D,Legacy Assurance,or the Funeral Guardian Society (fairy dust organizations).
Sometimes the client can receive an extra 1-2k in death benefit if the SL agent,LH agent didn't "slip" these extras in.
We are here to help seniors,not screw them.
Both LH and SL have the right to sell whatever they desire to whomever they desire. Other carriers have riders and add-ons, which they refer to as living benefits. Critical illness, AD&D, etc. If there were not a demand for a product or service, it wouldn't sell anyway. The crime is signing them onto things they did not agree to or authorize. Sure, some SL agents sign clients up to Legacy without their consent. Likewise, agents outside of SL also add riders to policies without the consent of clients.
It's not the product or company that's good or bad, it's the agent representing the product or company.
Let me be crystal clear. I am not promoting SL, LH, Legacy or Funeral Advantage. Just trying to frame the issue correctly.
Last edited: