Because I can use my cash values in more than one place.
But we can compare the S&P 500 from 2003 to 2008? lol.
This video was recorded 7 years ago, so you'd need to adjust it to 45,000 or so.
First- thank your for the reply. I did not intend a pissing match.
Here's what I see: SPY (which is the S&P) would have a 60% gain of a dollar invested in 2003 to 2008. At it's worst point that 2003 dollar hit break even in the middle of the 2009 collapse. That is ignoring the annual 1.8% dividend on the S&P. The video you linked to ignores dollar cost averages and dividends and presumes you chunk all your money in at the highest point and pull it all out at the lowest. An apples to apples comparison has the investor making the same contributions evenly - including during those lows.
Presuming you die (which is why they call it life insurance), that cash value has a 100% loss, so even the lowly DOW is looking like a pretty good return.
If you want to sell whole life, sell whole life. I don't think whole life companies are paying your commission by putting the money under a mattress or investing it into whole life which you are saying is better than the stock market...they're betting on the US economy.