- 9,744
UHC owes something only to their shareholders. Somebody holding a gun to your head to sell them?UHC made $5 billion net income last year and who knows what they pay AARP. I've heard 5%. Yep. We must help them by working for free.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
UHC owes something only to their shareholders. Somebody holding a gun to your head to sell them?UHC made $5 billion net income last year and who knows what they pay AARP. I've heard 5%. Yep. We must help them by working for free.
UHC owes something only to their shareholders. Somebody holding a gun to your head to sell them?
Not surprisingly, you've completely missed the point. I have NO interest in UHC - don't own the stock, don't work for 'em -don't sell any of their products.There's always a shrill apologist in the crowd who sticks up for the greedy HMO.
Like many, you're letting your emotion get in the way of logic. If their AARP arrangement wasn't profitable for them, they wouldn't do it!Like a previous poster said, who is holding a gun to UHC's head to pay its royalty to AARP?
So you don't want to take a "cut in pay", but he should? The CEO of UHC (and any public company) serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. If they don't think they're getting their money's worth, they can make a change (see Men's Warehouse). This is capitalism bub (thank god), the CEO is making exactly what he's worth.I somehow doubt that the Sob CEO will take any cuts in pay...
Please cite some examples of where this has occurred. Going with an MA plan is a choice. You could have selected original Medicare with a supp.but if you're unfortunate enough to live in an area where "AARP MA" products are the only available products, it might hurt.
Not surprisingly, you've completely missed the point. I have NO interest in UHC - don't own the stock, don't work for 'em -don't sell any of their products.
Like many, you're letting your emotion get in the way of logic. If their AARP arrangement wasn't profitable for them, they wouldn't do it!
So you don't want to take a "cut in pay", but he should? The CEO of UHC (and any public company) serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. If they don't think they're getting their money's worth, they can make a change (see Men's Warehouse). This is capitalism bub (thank god), the CEO is making exactly what he's worth.
Please cite some examples of where this has occurred. Going with an MA plan is a choice. You could have selected original Medicare with a supp.
The way it was explained to me by the local UHC Rep, was that with so many plans changing in 2014, they made this move knowing that plans in those areas wont be sold.
Then why the need to make it?
If you trust the UHC "rep" to tell you the truth - I've got some swampland in South Florida I'd like to talk to you about...
You on my a$$ for any particular reason?
Mm is sort of like our resident Dutch Uncle that always told you the way things were and a voice of reason amid the hype.