- 17,048
I'm not seeing this the way you guys are. It doesn't appear to me to have been Brad's decision at all. It's the agent's decision isn't it? If all the managers involved freely release agents then it comes down to the agent deciding where he wants to go. Not the managers and not the up line.
Now if the upline (in this case Brad) transfered the agent without Ben signing off on a release first, then I agree that Brad WAY overstepped a boundary. BUT if Ben has always stated that he will release agents and the agent clearly wanted to go elsewhere then Ben did need to release him. Regardless of whether he wanted to go to another agency within 360 or outside. I don't see where that makes any difference. It's ultimately the agent's decision.
I don't see how those type of situations could be avoided at agencies with that setup of various managers actively recruiting under the same general brand. Matt is out there actively pitching his hooks (the squad team, his own success in the field, etc.) to the masses. That's how he attracts agents. Some are going to get hooked that are already under the same organization under a different manager. I don't see how those situations wouldn't come up every once in a while.
It's no different than Ben having a lot of buzz right now at EFES. He's the new guy with new ideas for them. Is it impossible to think that one of Joe Chiacco's guys or Josh's guys isn't thinking "Hey I wish I was under this Boman guy or Springbok."
There are always going to be guys that get caught up in the recruiting pitches. Or maybe they just aren't perfectly a match for the guy they are under for what ever reason. Even me Newby (the most beloved forum member of all time) has people that I just don't gel with. We all do.
So the only crime that I see that Matt did was attract an agent that was already within the organization. He should discourage the agent as a courtesy to Ben if they were friends. But it's ultimately the agent's decision.
When an agency has those different channels I would think that stuff comes up every once in a while.
Now if the upline (in this case Brad) transfered the agent without Ben signing off on a release first, then I agree that Brad WAY overstepped a boundary. BUT if Ben has always stated that he will release agents and the agent clearly wanted to go elsewhere then Ben did need to release him. Regardless of whether he wanted to go to another agency within 360 or outside. I don't see where that makes any difference. It's ultimately the agent's decision.
I don't see how those type of situations could be avoided at agencies with that setup of various managers actively recruiting under the same general brand. Matt is out there actively pitching his hooks (the squad team, his own success in the field, etc.) to the masses. That's how he attracts agents. Some are going to get hooked that are already under the same organization under a different manager. I don't see how those situations wouldn't come up every once in a while.
It's no different than Ben having a lot of buzz right now at EFES. He's the new guy with new ideas for them. Is it impossible to think that one of Joe Chiacco's guys or Josh's guys isn't thinking "Hey I wish I was under this Boman guy or Springbok."
There are always going to be guys that get caught up in the recruiting pitches. Or maybe they just aren't perfectly a match for the guy they are under for what ever reason. Even me Newby (the most beloved forum member of all time) has people that I just don't gel with. We all do.
So the only crime that I see that Matt did was attract an agent that was already within the organization. He should discourage the agent as a courtesy to Ben if they were friends. But it's ultimately the agent's decision.
When an agency has those different channels I would think that stuff comes up every once in a while.