Cease FE face to face selling

But are they actually doing it? I don't think so and I don't think it will happen. Those Acts that were passed were passed as a political thing, not to actually "act" on it.
I can't prove it, but I've been hearing about it for years anecdotally from clinic workers who've witnessed it first hand. The bill just made it legal to do what they already were doing. To stop the same thing from happening here in Texas, the legislature passed the "Born Alive Infant Protection Act".
 
But are they actually doing it? I don't think so and I don't think it will happen. Those Acts that were passed were passed as a political thing, not to actually "act" on it.
When they passed the law in New York, those sicko politicians were cheering and jumping for joy. :mad:

What makes you think that now that they can legally do it..they won't? :skeptical:
 
Isn't that about he same as calling pro abortion Pro Choice?

Sure.

Though I wonder if anyone is "pro-abortion," right? I mean they are pro having the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. I wonder whether even those who do choose the procedure are "pro-abortion."

I sure wish the Supreme Court would have kept out of it and let it go where it would or would not go based on state legislatures or even congress.

Toughest issue in politics, no doubt. It is interesting to me that since the Family and Medical leave act went into law the number of abortions per year have dropped by more than half. Still far too many.

I wonder how many more would be avoided if it cost $350 to $950 in health care costs to carry the baby to term and $30,000 to abort the baby, rather than the other way around. It would be a very small price that would likely result in far, far fewer abortions.
 
When they passed the law in New York, those sicko politicians were cheering and jumping for joy. :mad:

What makes you think that now that they can legally do it..they won't? :skeptical:

I'm not defending abortion, but man, get the facts straight.

PolitiFact - No, New York abortion law doesn't let mothers abort babies a minute before they would be born

"The Reproductive Health Act, sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Liz Krueger, says that a health care practitioner "may perform an abortion when, according to the practitioner's reasonable and good faith professional judgment based on the facts of the patient's case: the patient is within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient's life or health."

Previously, women in New York could only get abortions after 24 weeks of pregnancy if their lives were threatened, according to Justin Flagg, a spokesman for Krueger.

Under the new law, he said, women can also get an abortion after 24 weeks if their health is threatened or the fetus isn't viable."
 
I'm not defending abortion, but man, get the facts straight.

PolitiFact - No, New York abortion law doesn't let mothers abort babies a minute before they would be born

"The Reproductive Health Act, sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Liz Krueger, says that a health care practitioner "may perform an abortion when, according to the practitioner's reasonable and good faith professional judgment based on the facts of the patient's case: the patient is within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient's life or health."

Previously, women in New York could only get abortions after 24 weeks of pregnancy if their lives were threatened, according to Justin Flagg, a spokesman for Krueger.

Under the new law, he said, women can also get an abortion after 24 weeks if their health is threatened or the fetus isn't viable."
7 states already allow abortion up to birth — not just New York
 
Back
Top