- Thread starter
- #21
That is often the case... The company officials issues decrees as to how things are done and then are so confident that no one would ever ignore their authority, they assume it is taken care of and do not follow up.Or leading people to believe the policy plus FCGS is a preneed plan.
That's true. But some companies have more guilty agents than others. And some companies are complicit. Remember the scandal involving a group of MetLife agents (back in the '90's) selling life insurance as a qualified TSA to healthcare workers?
'In an interview, Harry P. Kamen, Met Life's chairman and chief executive, described how the company had ignored warning signs of unethical practices that he said began in its Tampa, Fla., office and spread elsewhere.
"You could say the company is a little too trusting," he said, referring to incidents in which auditors told executives to stop certain practices and assumed that the orders were carried out. In one instance, he said, auditors at the company's home office uncovered practices in Tampa that were counter to Met Life policy. Although the problems were reported to the appropriate executives, no action was taken.'
Met Life Drops Execs Amid Probes : Insurance: While states investigate possible ethics violations, firm sets up a multimillion-dollar restitution effort for policyholders.