- 4,872
If you could do that then why don't you?
Experience with Senior Life ?
- Thread starter Roses39
- Start date
If you could do that then why don't you?
I am sure there are to the IMOs that are producing at that level.. 120% is easy to get with many carriers with no proof of production or commitment. However, to get that at SL you have to be producing $125K per month.. Without recruiting, even outstanding agents are not going to do that.
Hey.. I have a five year old daughter to raise... I still have to work every now and then..
- 4,872
LOL. That's a pretty good answer for someone who talks like the armchair quarterback....but doesn't have the skill, experience, knowledge, discipline, or ability to get in the game. Take the hits and bruises but you also get the TD's.
You spout off at me about recruiting yet you now seem to be admitting that you don't know anything about it. You say you don't have any interest in recruiting and that's cool, not everyone has that desire. But they sure don't go around pounding their chests like a 25 year old Tarzan criticizing someone they don't know personally doing something that they themselves can't do.......lol. That's what losers do, wouldn't you agree? (Love those tie-downs).
If you make your $$ on your personal production that's cool too. But the way I see it, and I'm sure some of the quiet forum members see it, you spend so much time up here that you're drawing an unemployment check instead of writing business. Loser.
I hinted that you might be 25 up above, but if you're younger than that please forgive me for giving you too much credit. You never share good sales techniques, strategies, knowledge up here. All you do is try to sound like a successful big shot criticizing other opportunities rather than sharing what your great opportunity is...lol. (That's because you don't have a great opportunity...lol). Now I know why. You're drawing an unemployment check instead of making yourself successful. Loser.
Last edited:
- 4,872
Remember, this structure is geared towards recruiting the BIG dogs, not the little pups. It's another step to becoming the biggest carrier in the FE stadium. Don't forget all the extras that Sr Life agents enjoy that brokers don't have available to them.
Equally important is the 150% prevents a 10k monthly producer getting an 85% and another 10k agent getting 125% simply because the luck of the draw of which SL manager's recruiting ad they saw. Makes the playing field level for SL agents. Seems like a good thing doesn't it?
If brokers don't like this arrangement then they should stay where they are: prepaying $2000 up front and then having to wait 4 weeks before their leads even come in and including the risk of a bad return % (we have lead financing) and SL takes the risk of the return %, charge backs coming off the next advance (not with us), their broke broker manager cherry picking the leads before agents get them and/or reselling old leads as if they were fresh, (our leads come directly from the home office) AND A LOT MORE.
Have a good evening.
Last edited:
- 1,832
You
Why are you spewing trash ?
Brokers are calling out the obvious spin you try to weave on green agents.
The three most important facts for newly licensed independent final expense agents:
1. Avoid contracting with Senior Life
2. Avoid contracting with Lincoln Heritage
3. Pick an IMO that offers many companies, starts your contract level at 110%-120% commission
There you go !
Why are you spewing trash ?
Brokers are calling out the obvious spin you try to weave on green agents.
The three most important facts for newly licensed independent final expense agents:
1. Avoid contracting with Senior Life
2. Avoid contracting with Lincoln Heritage
3. Pick an IMO that offers many companies, starts your contract level at 110%-120% commission
There you go !
- 17,072
Yes I have 150% with several carriers. Most will require proof of $10,000,000 per year for that. But not all with one carrier. That would be tough to do with just one carrier if that's what SL is requiring.
And I would definitely not expect them to give agencies like mine that level based on production elsewhere when we place very little of it there. That would not be fair to guys like you.
I like Steve. But I don't think that video is a good approach. It does sound like it's something new for individual agents. It's going to come across like over promising and under delivering if it's basically unobtainable for them. And for agency production at those levels they can definitely get that from numerous companies.
Similar threads
