Duford Insurance Group vs. Digital BGA for Final Expense Telesales

[Telesales314]

JRoot made the choice to then tell a lie about me which was that I was misinterpreting and then he crossed the line and broke the law.
-------Your stance was that his release was 'not standard' and that it is difficult to get a release. Multiple people have stated that it is very common, that he releases easily, and that you were in fact released to a competitor. Stating that you 'misinterpreted', seems to be correct.
-----Now he did say 'completely false' to noncompete of the jump, and if he had dug in there you would be justified.. But as soon as he realized who you were and that you were an employee, he corrected his error.
----He does have a non-compete for employees. As he stated, they are rarely enforced, and was not enforced on you since he released you to North Star. I used to work on a 'reduced commission for free-leads' setup and had a noncompete, and when I left they knew where I was going and did not enforce it. It is basically just to prevent someone from taking the 'free leads' and selling them for full commission with a different IMO.

At the point he launched into me-there is not a way to come out winning-is there? If I allow him-well then there you go...he showed her. Clearly she wasn't being honest. If I fight back-I am a uncoachable hot tempered immature Karen. Okay. Call me Karen then.
----'Launching into you'? You posted your opinion, and it contained some things that were questionable (DBGA has non-standard release language, they are difficult to get releases from). He corrected the record, and then posted the exact language from the release that you wanted to post. Also other board members also weighed in to support his claims. The whole time @JRoot gave you the benefit of the doubt that you misinterpreted.


You don't decide for me and you don't get to intimidate someone by doxing them because you don't like their opinion especially when facts back that opinion up.
----I think I think there is a difference between doxxed and 'business clarified a complaint'
----Example: Me on yelp-" XYZ Italian restaurant on Franklin Blvd is horrible, wouldn't give us a table. Ruined my anniversary! 1 star"
---- Restaurant manager: Apologies sir, as I explained when you tried to walk past the 'closed for private party' sign, we are closed on St. Patricks day every year for our company party."

----Now as the customer I can have the opinion that they are horrible, and they (truly) did not give us a table, and my anniversary was truly ruined. But that can also not be the whole story. In the managers response, he let everyone know that I am a straight male, and I probably have an anniversary on St Patricks day, or at least that week. Is that also doxxing? IMHO no.
----Giving background info on the complaint, while still hiding your identity, is a good thing. If every business' response was only 'this person is wrong' it would be impossible to tell fact/fiction.

 

[CLTX]

At no point did I imply that I am any of those things. I used those as examples that clearly demonstrate that there are multiple scenarios where it is encouraged and not only accepted for someone to speak up about something that is wrong with, a group, entity, or organization under the condition of annonymity. Therefore many agree that it is not cowardly. I challenge the next person to say one thing that is true. Seriously. One good point that is actually truthful, not ugly, name calling, emotional, or not at all based in reality.

 

[whatyouwantfinally]

Lets see there are protective laws for whistle blowers, there is witness protection, anti-doxing laws and statutes. Funny how the law and mutiple lawmakers disagree with you then. Only a vindictive and I assume emotionally stunted man slanders and doxes anyone who is critical of his business. That was an opportunity to get better and look good in the process for JRoot had he handled it right. If any of you are here to recruit..I suggest you stop to think what a newbie would think of your take on this. You are on this platform telling someone that an agency owner has the right to do these things to her for being critical of his business -even in an honest and factual way and furthermore she is a Karen for taking issue with that. Do you really think the self-respecting newbies reading this are going to be eager to then work with you? Good luck.

You weren't doxxed and no laws were broken. Doxxing isn't when someone figures out who you are. Nothing was done to you at all. The only bad thing that has happened to you is the exposure your own bad traits to anyone reading this thread, and YOU did that.

 

[CLTX]

I stand by what I said about the non-compete. That is not standard. So let's do this. All here seem to proclaim that that release is common and I am a coward for not showing who I am-as you gang up on me from mutiple annonymous handles. Why don't you send releases that you have signed or had signed that have that wording and show names and dates and grant me permission to double check on the validity?!

 

[CLTX]

You might want to lookup doxing. I was doxed. Next.

 

[whatyouwantfinally]

You might want to lookup doxing. I was doxed. Next.

No, you absolutely weren't. Again; doxxing isn't when someone figures out who you are.

 

[CLTX]

Telesales315 You are unaware that he posted my name. That was to make me back down You said "multiple people on here have said this is standard" I don't see that. Show me please. Mutiple people have laid into me. Every 2 minutes someone is slamming me now. What would you call that? I have contacted the administators and left a message. I need to get back to work but it is difficult not to respond when literally each message is without context or is not truthful.

 

[rousemark]

I stand by what I said about the non-compete. That is not standard. So let's do this. All here seem to proclaim that that release is common and I am a coward for not showing who I am-as you gang up on me from mutiple annonymous handles. Why don't you send releases that you have signed or had signed that have that wording and show names and dates and grant me permission to double check on the validity?!

I have a user name but I do not hide behind it. Most on here know my name and where I am located just as I know their real names (can't remeber them but I know them). I have never signed a non compete with an IMO and never would. As for releases, I have never found it necessary to request one. If you do your due diligence before signing a contract, you should not have a problem after signing it.

 

[CLTX]

Whatyouwantfinally Doxing Definition: the action or process of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent: I was doxed. If someone gives your business a bad review, you have the right as the business to respond and get the last word but you do NOT have the right to say who they are. The internet/Google prevents that because it is doxing.

 

[goillini52]

I stand by what I said about the non-compete. That is not standard. So let's do this. All here seem to proclaim that that release is common and I am a coward for not showing who I am-as you gang up on me from mutiple annonymous handles. Why don't you send releases that you have signed or had signed that have that wording and show names and dates and grant me permission to double check on the validity?!