I really am having a hard time wrapping my feeble mind around this discussion and why you are taking JD to task over his choice of companies. There are many reasons a person chooses to rep a company other than commission. For me, people relationships are one of them. I would rather use a company that teats me as a person rather than a number because usually that leads to better communication and you have a chance of getting things done that the other companies would not even consider. My favorite company of all time was a company called National Savings Life. Was on a first name basis with almost everyone in the HO. We were able to have input on product development, etc. that most other companies would not even consider. They paid fair commission rates but were not the highest.No spin zone here dude.
And It's not name-calling. It's asking legitimate questions about writing a company with the lowest commissions in the independent FE agent market.
With your 18 years experience and your skills and tools,seems like you're allowing yourself to get bent over and write for 100%.
Don't you feel your worth more than that ?
I mean Greg with Senior Life starts brand new agents at 90%,right ?
Again,this is a legitimate question.
Hope you sell a bunch today.
Another company was Settlers Life pre bankruptcy. They had great agent service and some of the Huff-Cook plans filled nice niches even though they didn't pay very high commissions.
If a person chooses a company simply for high commissions, so be it. But I prefer communication, ease of doing business, and great service over 10%-15% commission rate. In long run, I made more money that way. For example, had I been using Trans, I would have stayed so torn up over what I have heard you fellows say about them, it certainly would have affected my production in a negative manner.
BTW, I seem to remember when Settlers was your goto company and they certainly did not pay the highest commissions available.
Last edited: