Abrasax
Guru
- 401
Speaking of replacements, @theinsuranceman do you ever replace cheaper policies with SL selling them on the LA benefits?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That right there.... I try to think about what I would recommend my mom do.
Speaking of replacements, @theinsuranceman do you ever replace cheaper policies with SL selling them on the LA benefits?
That's pretty much my replacement philosophy except that I may be more cautious about replacing on price if they're out of or close to being out of contestability. But I agree - no mercy on cleansheeting!When I was in the field I did a lot of replacements. What I looked for on these was:
1. Price- the most obvious one. If you can substantially beat the price.
2. Type of policy- the majority of replacement bait was mail order term with increasing rates and expiration age. Or GI with a two year waiting period.
3. Universal Life- most people that were sold ULs back in the late 1980"s and 1990's had them WAY underfunded and 100% of them thought they had whole-life. I just LOVED making their own company answer the questions about what they had on speaker phone. OK so if f they want to GUARANTEE this policy stays in force to age 100, how much premium do they need to start paying TODAY to make that happen? The answer was never pretty.
4. Clean Sheeted- I HATE clean sheeting agents. I ruined a LOT of their days. Always look to see if the person really qualified for what they had. Let's call the company together Mrs. Smith and make sure they will still pay the claim on this policy if you die tonight since the agent mistakenly checked "no" to Parkinson's even though you told him you have it.
There is a TON of replacement business that FE agents run into out there that actually help people. They are scumbags if they are doing things that they would not want done to their own mother. When agents ask me how to determine when a replacement makes sense I tell them to judge by two things: it's up to the customer once they understand the choices. Make sure they understand the advantage and disadvantage (contestibility in the event of fraud or suicide) and #2 if you ever have to stand before the state department of insurance and explain this replacement are you going to look fine or like a greedy scumbag?
In 22 years of selling nsurance and some months replacements hit 50% I've never had a single complaint. I've had very few deaths during the 1st two years (with 1st day coverage policies) and all but two of those paid the claim.
And another thing that really blows me up is agents who replace and don't fill out replacement forms. That's a scumbag move. If you aren't filling out replacement forms, you are doing dirty replacements.
If a policy is out of contestability, I'll probably leave it alone, unless there's some other compelling reason to replace it. Sometimes even when I point out the obvious fraud and tell them about contestability, the client will tell me, "Yeah, the agent told me about that, but he said as long as I live 2 years it won't matter." My response to that is, "Your agent was willing to lie to the company that writes his paycheck. Do you think he'll have any trouble lying to you?" If they insist on sticking with it, or if they've chosen a GI over a standard policy (with full understanding) as you mentioned, at least they've made a conscious choice for themself. Doesn't stop me from trying to unhook a dishonest agent's business, though.Yes but clean sheetings irrelevant after 2 yrs. Also i run into a lot of people that will take the chance with Moo's Gi if there a smoker standard . I've lost out a few times to that. Moo's Gi is sometimes 30% cheaper with the above
Yes but clean sheetings irrelevant after 2 yrs. Also i run into a lot of people that will take the chance with Moo's Gi if there a smoker standard . I've lost out a few times to that. Moo's Gi is sometimes 30% cheaper with the above